AI Usage Policy
AIAdopt, version 2.0
In force: 31 July 2026 · Next review: Q1 2027
Why are we publishing this document?
AIAdopt sells EU AI Act compliance training to other organisations. It would be odd if we didn't have an AI Usage Policy ourselves. We have one, since 21 April 2026, and we publish it here because we think that is consistent: practising what we teach. This document is not a marketing piece, it is our working internal policy. Anyone who wants to see how a sole proprietorship sets up workable AI governance can read along here.
1. Document control
2. Purpose
This policy describes how AIAdopt deploys artificial intelligence in its own operations, and which rules apply to everyone who uses AI tools on behalf of AIAdopt. It exists for two reasons: to ensure that AIAdopt itself practises what it teaches its clients, and to comply with the AI literacy obligation of Article 4 EU AI Act, as well as the voluntary governance commitments AIAdopt has entered into under the EU AI Pact pledges.
3. Scope and organisational context
AIAdopt is a Belgian sole proprietorship. The organisation has one human worker (the founder, Rob Ummels) and uses AI systems intensively as a working tool. This is a deliberate choice of operating model, not a temporary situation. The policy is written to reflect that reality, not a fictional larger organisation.
Persons covered by this policy
AI systems covered by this policy
4. Roles and responsibilities
Because AIAdopt has one human worker, role separation as in larger organisations is not possible. The founder fills all governance roles, supported by the explicit rules and reviews in this policy.
5. Permitted use of AI
Permitted applications
Prohibited applications
6. Operational rules
The following rules apply to day-to-day AI use within AIAdopt. They arose during the build-up phase of the organisation and are formally recorded here.
Rule 1: Noticeboard test for input
Before entering information into an AI tool, the operator applies the noticeboard test: would I not mind if this information were posted on a public noticeboard? If the answer is no, the information must not be entered. This rule applies to client names, personal data, contracts, financial data, login credentials, internal strategy, and third-party information obtained in confidence.
Rule 2: Output review before publication or deployment
No AI output is published, deployed, sent to a client or otherwise used externally without review by the founder. The review checks factual accuracy, accuracy of quotations and source references, alignment with the house style, absence of hallucinations, and compliance with copyright and applicable law.
Rule 3: Transparency about AI use
Where AI has played a substantial role in externally published content, the AI use is disclosed. AI-generated images are given an indication of the tool used. Articles in the Insights section carry an attribution at the end of the article. Section 8 sets out when this disclosure is legally required and when AIAdopt applies it as a matter of its own policy.
Rule 4: No shadow AI
Only AI tools listed in the AI Tool Inventory may be used for AIAdopt work. Browser extensions with AI features, free trial accounts of new tools, and personal AI accounts not registered for business use may not be used for AIAdopt or client data. Adding a new tool requires an update to the inventory before first operational use.
Rule 5: Knowledge of prohibited practices
The founder keeps up-to-date knowledge of the practices prohibited under Article 5 EU AI Act, and ensures that no AI use within AIAdopt falls into a prohibited category. An annual review confirms this.
7. Data protection and confidentiality
All AI use must comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and with applicable Belgian data protection legislation. Specific rules:
8. Transparency about AI use (Article 50 EU AI Act and internal policy)
Article 50 EU AI Act sets out transparency obligations for certain AI systems and certain AI-generated or manipulated content, including direct interaction with AI, deepfakes and AI-generated or manipulated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest. For that last category, the disclosure obligation does not apply where the text has undergone substantive human review or editorial control and a natural or legal person holds editorial responsibility for the publication. AIAdopt additionally applies broader transparency on a voluntary basis, including where Article 50 does not require it.
This section describes what AIAdopt currently does. If our use of AI changes, this section changes with it.
Illustrations. The footer of aiadopt.eu states on every page that all illustrations on this site are AI-generated from human prompts, naming the tools used. Current tools: Google Gemini and OpenAI ChatGPT. AIAdopt applies this statement as standard, including where Article 50 does not require separate disclosure.
Labelling of illustrations. For illustrations that are not subject to a separate legal labelling obligation, AIAdopt uses a central statement in the website footer. Where an image, audio or video falls under a disclosure obligation under Article 50, that content is marked separately, clearly and on first exposure as AI-generated or manipulated. AIAdopt follows current European Commission guidance in doing so.
Spoken course material. The trainings include a read-aloud function. The voice is AI-generated, in every available language. The button the learner uses to start the audio says so, before playback begins. Current tool: ElevenLabs. AIAdopt does not create a voice clone of any staff member, learner, client or other identifiable person, and does not present the voice used as that of an existing person.
Articles. Articles in the Insights section carry an attribution at the end naming the human author and the AI collaborator, and stating that AIAdopt bears editorial responsibility. AIAdopt discloses these AI contributions as a transparency practice, even where the text has been human-reviewed and falls under AIAdopt's editorial responsibility.
Imitation of existing people. AIAdopt does not use AI-generated images or audio that imitate existing, identifiable people.
Interactive AI on the website. AIAdopt currently does not use a chatbot or interactive AI agent on the website. If one is introduced, it will be clearly labelled as AI before the interaction begins.
9. Human oversight (principle of Article 14 EU AI Act)
Although Article 14 EU AI Act legally applies to high-risk AI systems, AIAdopt voluntarily applies the underlying principle of meaningful human oversight to all of its AI use. Based on the current AI Tool Inventory, AIAdopt develops or uses no high-risk AI systems. The principle is applied as follows:
10. Incident handling
Incidents involving AI tools used by AIAdopt are handled in accordance with the AIAdopt AI Incident Procedure. Triggers in brief: any incident that may constitute a personal data breach under the GDPR, any AI incident that may fall under a legal reporting obligation (including, where relevant, Article 73 EU AI Act), any incident affecting the integrity or availability of the AIAdopt training platform, and any externally published AI output that later proves materially incorrect or harmful.
11. Training and competence
12. Review and update of this policy
13. References
Approved by:
Rob Ummels, founder, AIAdopt
rob@aiadopt.eu · https://aiadopt.eu
Place and date: Maaseik, Belgium · 31 July 2026